<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frederick Goh &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/category/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization, Internet Marketing, Net Revenue, Investment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 17:14:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social Signal</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/social-signal</link>
		<comments>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/social-signal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 06:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After chasing PageRank for years, webmasters now have to add another dimension to their search engine optimisation consideration. This is particularly true after Google launch the Google Plus(Google+) and started Google Plus One(+1). 
Social signal can come from various sources, for example Facebook Like, Retweet, Google +1, etc. Think about the following scenarios:
* If a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After chasing PageRank for years, webmasters now have to add another dimension to their search engine optimisation consideration. This is particularly true after Google launch the Google Plus(Google+) and started Google Plus One(+1). </p>
<p>Social signal can come from various sources, for example Facebook Like, Retweet, Google +1, etc. Think about the following scenarios:</p>
<p>* If a lot of your friends &#8220;Like&#8221; <a href="https://www.facebook.com/malaysiabrides" target="_blank">Malaysia Brides Facebook Page</a>, when you search Malaysia Wedding Forum or Malaysia Bridal Forum, shouldn&#8217;t MalaysiaBrides.com rank higher in the search result because your friends recommended(the signal) the site indirectly to you and there is a high chance that your friends are members of that forum as well.</p>
<p>* If Matt Cutts retweeted my post about SEO or Social Signal, shouldn&#8217;t my page rank higher for such search term because the Guru in the field has recommended me.</p>
<p>Similar to PageRank, the quality of social signal counts. The search engines nowadays are smart enough to give weightage to the person behind it. That&#8217;s the reason where Google trying to get to know a person more by starting Google+. Matt also confirmed that Google started to extend the use of social signal(initially was meant for real time result).</p>
<p>Below are Q&#038;A compiled by <a href="http://searchengineland.com/what-social-signals-do-google-bing-really-count-55389" target="_blank">Danny Sullivan</a>.</p>
<p><font color="orange"><strong>1) If an article is retweeted or referenced much in Twitter, do you count that as a signal outside of finding any non-nofollowed links that may naturally result from it?</strong></font></p>
<p>Bing:<br />
We do look at the social authority of a user. We look at how many people you follow, how many follow you, and this can add a little weight to a listing in regular search results. It carries much more weight in Bing Social Search, where tweets from more authoritative people will flow to the top when best match relevancy is used.</p>
<p>Google:<br />
Yes, we do use it as a signal. It is used as a signal in our organic and news rankings. We also use it to enhance our news universal by marking how many people shared an article [NOTE: see the end of this article for more about that].</p>
<p><font color="orange"><strong>2) Do you try to calculate the authority of someone who tweets that might be assigned to their Twitter page. Do you try to “know,” if you will, who they are?</strong></font></p>
<p>Bing:<br />
Yes. We do calculate the authority of someone who tweets. For known public figures or publishers, we do associate them with who they are. (For example, query for Danny Sullivan)</p>
<p>Google:<br />
Yes we do compute and use author quality. We don’t know who anyone is in real life <img src='http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><font color="orange"><strong>3) Do you calculate whether a link should carry more weight depending on the person who tweets it?</strong></font></p>
<p>Bing:<br />
Yes.</p>
<p>Google:<br />
Yes we do use this as a signal, especially in the “Top links” section [of Google Realtime Search]. Author authority is independent of PageRank, but it is currently only used in limited situations in ordinary web search.</p>
<p><font color="orange"><strong>4) Do you track links shared within Facebook, either through personal walls or fan pages?</strong></font></p>
<p>Bing:<br />
Yes. We look at links shared that are marked as “Everyone,” and links shared from Facebook fan pages.</p>
<p>Google:<br />
We treat links shared on Facebook fan pages the same as we treat tweeted links. We have no personal wall data from Facebook.</p>
<p><font color="orange"><strong>5) Do you try to calculate the authority of someone on Facebook, either say via their personal wall or their fan page.</strong></font></p>
<p>Bing:<br />
We don’t do this on Facebook. On Facebook, we only get what’s public, only updates and things you’ve posted to everyone as viewable. We don’t get things only shared with friends, so we don’t know how authoritative you are on Facebook. There isn’t the whole convenient retweet mechanism we see on Twitter.<br />
We do see valuable content shared by Facebook users, even though we only get what’s public.  For example when Gary Coleman died we saw a  video from Different Strokes, saying his favorite line “what ya talk’in ’bout Willis” gain popularity.  It happened to be what a lot of people are sharing on the day he passed away.</p>
<p>Google:<br />
Again, the treatment is the same as for Twitter. And we have no personal wall data from Facebook.</p>
<p><font color="orange"><strong>6) Do you calculate whether a link should carry more weight depending on the person who shared it on Facebook?</strong></font></p>
<p>Bing:<br />
We can tell if something is of quality on Facbook by leveraging Twitter. If the same link is shared in both places, it’s more likely to be legitimate.</p>
<p>Google:<br />
Same as question 5.</p>
<p><font color="orange"><strong>7) And just to be really clear, the new Facebook data is not yet being used in ordinary web search, right? (asked only of Bing, because it was only relevant to them)</strong></font></p>
<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/social-signal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landing page load time will affect your Adwords soon</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/landing-page-load-time-will-affect-your-adwords-soon</link>
		<comments>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/landing-page-load-time-will-affect-your-adwords-soon#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/landing-page-load-time-will-affect-your-adwords-soon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago, google announced that landing page load time will soon be incorporated into Quality Score. 
In short:
Why are we doing this?
Two reasons: first, users have the best experience when they don&#8217;t have to wait a long time for landing pages to load. Interstitial pages, multiple redirects, excessively slow servers, and other things [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago, google <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/03/landing-page-load-time-will-soon-be.html">announced</a> that landing page load time will soon be incorporated into <a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=10215">Quality Score</a>. </p>
<p>In short:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Why are we doing this?</strong><br />
Two reasons: first, users have the best experience when they don&#8217;t have to wait a long time for landing pages to load. Interstitial pages, multiple redirects, excessively slow servers, and other things that can increase load times only keep users from getting what they want: information about your business. Second, users are more likely to abandon landing pages that load slowly, which can hurt your conversion rate.</p></blockquote>
<p>And it means:</p>
<blockquote><p>After the one month review period, this load time factor will be incorporated into your keywords&#8217; Quality Scores. Keywords with landing pages that load very slowly may get lower Quality Scores (and thus higher minimum bids). Conversely, keywords with landing pages that load very quickly may get higher Quality Scores and lower minimum bids.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Basically the the shorter loading time, the better position and lower minimum bids you might get. May be is a good news for web hosting companies as well?? LOL</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering will this affect Adsense users eventually. Say if my site has shorter loading time, isn&#8217;t it give Adwords users a better platform to show their ads as well? Should I be rewarded as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/landing-page-load-time-will-affect-your-adwords-soon/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adwords Abuse + Adsense Arbitrage = MFA</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/adwords-abuse-adsense-arbitrage-mfa</link>
		<comments>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/adwords-abuse-adsense-arbitrage-mfa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/adwords-abuse-adsense-arbitrage-mfa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PuXilEu2EfI"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PuXilEu2EfI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/adwords-abuse-adsense-arbitrage-mfa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Master Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/google-master-plan</link>
		<comments>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/google-master-plan#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/google-master-plan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The original content has be erased, i guess this is one of the highest resolution backup that we can get  
http://undergoogle.com/tools/GoogleMasterPlanEN.html
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original content has be erased, i guess this is one of the highest resolution backup that we can get <img src='http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://undergoogle.com/tools/GoogleMasterPlanEN.html">http://undergoogle.com/tools/GoogleMasterPlanEN.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/google-master-plan/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Docs &amp; Spreadsheets Service</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/google-docs-spreadsheets-service</link>
		<comments>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/google-docs-spreadsheets-service#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/article/13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now you can create / edit / and share spreadsheets and documents using google, I would say this is a great service. I&#8217;m struggling whether should I upload all my existing spreadsheets? May be I trust google more than my machine  
If someone send a spreadsheet to your gmail account, let say excel, you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you can create / edit / and share spreadsheets and documents using google, I would say this is a great service. I&#8217;m struggling whether should I upload all my existing spreadsheets? May be I trust google more than my machine <img src='http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If someone send a spreadsheet to your gmail account, let say excel, you can actually open and save that directly into your google account : </p>
<p><strong>1. Open and save to google service directly from GMail</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/wp-content/wp-images/google-spreadsheet-open.png" alt="google spreadsheet open" /></p>
<p>You can share the spreadsheet with other users, all of you view and edit that spreadsheet at the same time, and guess what? Chat at the same screen also, that&#8217;s the discuss and collaborate function. There are more and more functions being added to this service, really excited to see what will happen next.<br />
<strong><br />
2. Collaborate and Discuss the spreadsheet online</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/wp-content/wp-images/google-spreadsheet.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/wp-content/wp-images/google-spreadsheet-small.gif" alt="google spreadsheet "border="0" /></a></p>
<p>No PDF writer? No Microsoft Office? How about save it to offline file in different format?</p>
<p><strong>3. Save as PDF, OpenOffice, etc</strong><br />
<img src="http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/wp-content/wp-images/google-document.png" alt="google document" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/google-docs-spreadsheets-service/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GMail compose message tips</title>
		<link>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/gmail-compose-message-tips</link>
		<comments>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/gmail-compose-message-tips#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/article/11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever wonder why you can not have GMail inbox in 1 tab, GMail compose message box in another? Do you face the difficulty to find a contact from inbox while composing message? I guess what we normally do is save the message as a Draft first, check the information from inbox, then open [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever wonder why you can not have GMail inbox in 1 tab, GMail compose message box in another? Do you face the difficulty to find a contact from inbox while composing message? I guess what we normally do is save the message as a Draft first, check the information from inbox, then open back the Draft and continue with the message.</p>
<p>Now you can have the compose box as a popup by pressing the Shift key + left click on the Compose Mail link. Something like below : </p>
<p><img src="http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/wp-content/wp-images/compose-gmail.gif" alt="gmail compose popup" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.frederickgoh.com/blog/articles/gmail-compose-message-tips/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

